|
Dispatch
Law and Rights Index
日本語
Who is your REAL employer? - BE AWARE!
Recently, the National Union of
General Workers has been in contact with numerous boards of education (BoE) in
the Kansai, Kanto, Kyushu, and Tokai regions concerning their employment
practices regarding Assistant English Teachers (AETs). We are particularly
concerned over the growing number of subcontracted workers and how they are
dispatched. Boards of Education currently hire teachers in three ways: direct
employment (DE), along with two types of dispatch, HAKEN and ININ (illegal).
What's the difference?
-
Direct Employment - means that the BoE hires you, pays
you, and controls your workday. In the union's opinion, this is the ideal situation, because teachers know exactly where they
stand in regards to their employment.
-
HAKEN - Your employer is not the BoE, even though they control your
work. You are hired by private company X which sends you to the BoE: X hires you
and pays your salary, and the BoE trains you and directs your work.
-
ININ - The BoE is neither your employer, nor do they control
your work. In this case X hires you, pays you, trains you, and controls your
work: the BoE is simply the work location.
To make things even worse, a
growing number of dispatch companies are now treating their employees as private
companies - subcontractors. In the union's
opinion, this kind of work is illegal and the dispatch companies are doing this
only in order to deprive teachers of their full rights as employees under the
labour laws.
[top]
So why does the difference matter?
You may be thinking, 'As long as I'm getting paid, why does it matter how I'm
employed as long as I have a job and get my salary?'
What many people don't see is that the way you're
employed can have a dramatic impact on your employment security. Let's
have a look at the categories one by one:
-
Direct Employment - There is no misunderstanding of who the
employer is, and usually you are made aware of workplace regulations. Also,
there is no argument about who the union should negotiate with, as there is only
one possible employer. Job losses appear to be fewer and it's
easier to negotiate if job losses do occur.
-
HAKEN - Under this system, there may be different
expectations on you because in a sense you have two bosses. In order to dispatch
a teacher under the HAKEN system, the dispatching company must have a special
license. The union believes that this is the only legal kind of dispatch allowed
to school boards and universities (see below). Also, because this is supposed to
be a temporary placement, after one year (three years as of January 1, 2004) the
school board is required to stop using a dispatch agency and either make the job
a direct hire or abolish the job itself. This is to ensure that schools don't
keep people temporary forever. Many boards have disregarded this one year limit
or claim that the dispatch is not HAKEN. The Osaka Prefectural Board's
plan was to use HAKEN forever by leaving a gap between employment terms so that
they could claim the jobs were temporary. This also leads to employment
insecurity as the dispatch contracts need to be renewed each year. If your
present employer loses the contract with the school board, you are out of a job.
-
ININ - According to the Osaka Prefectural Board of
Education, this system is illegal in any school board as it is a violation of
the Education Law which does not allow teachers who are not under the control of
the board of education to work in a school. Despite this, many school boards use
this method as there is no limit on the length of time a teacher can be
dispatched for (see below). This kind of employment is
extremely insecure, as the dispatch contracts need to be renewed each year. If
your present employer loses the school board contract, again, you are out of a
job.
[top]
What should I do if I work at a school board?
Whether you are presently directly employed, being
dispatched, or you simply don't know your employment status (see the checklist
below), please contact the unions to discuss how we can all work
together to protect your and your coworkers' employment in Japan.
[top]
For Real Secure Jobs - Stop Sub-Contracting
Below are some of the labour disputes that the National
Union of General Workers has been involved in regarding dispatch across Japan.
-
Universities and Junior Colleges
This sector continues to see a deterioration of conditions and job losses, due
to the discriminatory treatment of part time lecturers, and the steady growth of
the dispatch system. The failure of many of these institutions to follow the
labour laws of Japan has put them in direct conflict with NUGW unions across the
country. This sectors further failure to enroll teachers in unemployment
insurance, or offer any kind of job security, leaves teachers in a vulnerable
position. The General Union's victory in forcing
Ritsumeikan University to enroll teachers into the unemployment insurance fund
will go a long way in winning this right at universities across Japan.
-
Tokyo Board of Education
AETs at the Tokyo Metropolitan High School were told by the board that they
should consider themselves not to be employees and more importantly, the board
would therefore not negotiate with their union NUGW Tokyo South. A victory at
the Tokyo Labour Commission has now secured their right to bargaining and their
status as employees. Sad that the largest board in the country has gone down to
the level of the worst of the Eikaiwas.
-
Kita Kyushu Board of Education
The 'Owls' Company dispatches to
the Kitakyushu Board of Education. OWLS refused to recognise the teachers they
dispatched as employees, instead classifying them as sub-contractors. This meant
that teachers were not able to claim basic rights such as paid annual leave,
unemployment insurance, and the right to have a union represent them. After
pressure from the Fukuoka General Union, Owls agreed to recognize the teachers
as employees. This is a big step but the illegal ININ
dispatch system between the company and the board continues.
-
Osaka Prefectural Board of Education
The Osaka Prefectural Board, even though they have used the legal HAKEN system
of dispatch as opposed to ININ has undermined employment security for foreign
teachers. The board was unable to answer why they moved from their past system
of direct hires to using ECC's subsidiary 'Best Career' (who couldn't even
fill the positions they promised to). One important revelation that the board
admitted to the General Union is that in their opinion, the ININ dispatch system
was a violation of the Education Law as boards of education could not maintain
direct control over teachers' work. When asked why the
Hirakata and Toyonaka City Boards have not been ordered to stop using the
illegal ININ system, the Prefectural board answered that they would only give
these city boards direction if they were asked to by the boards themselves.
-
Nishinomiya Board of Education
Despite this board being warned by the union that the use of ININ workers is
illegal under the Education Law, they went ahead in October 2003 and brought in
two ININ teachers. The General Union, after winning the end of contract limits
for AETs, views this contracting out of work as an attempt to bust the union at
the board and as a violation of not only the Dispatch and Education Laws, but
also of the Trade Union Law (Article 7, Unfair Labour Practices)
The General Union branch at this board has recently submitted demands that
the board stop these illegal practices.
If you're not directly employed, what kind of dispatch do you fall under?
If you answer YES to any of the questions below, chances are you come under the HAKEN system.
YES - The school directs my work in terms of scheduling and class times.
YES - The school decides the textbook and/or curriculum.
YES - The school supervises my teaching.
YES - The school board provides training and meetings for the teachers.
|
[top]
学校当局・教育委員会は まともな直接雇用をせよ.
労働法に違反した「入札」は,講師の使い捨て
大学・短大では
劣悪かつ差別的な非常勤講師の待遇に加え,最近では派遣や委託など一層の雇用破壊がみられ,雇用保険に入らせない等の法違反も続いている.だがどの場合でも,仕事内容での学校当局の指揮管理が明らかであり,労働者性がはっきりしている以上,労働法の全面適用義務は疑う余地はない.
東京都教委では
都立国際高校の外国人講師は,「委任契約で,賃金でなくお礼」などと,【全国一般東京なんぶ】との団交も拒否.だが都労働委員会は「授業管理は教委で,労働者性=雇用は明確」と判断,石原都知事の労組法違反【不当労働行為】と断定.
北九州市教委では
正式な雇用によらず,各校講師を不自然にも,「(株) アウルズ」に独占的に下請けさせ,さらに講師は2重下請けとされ,解雇も強行.労組【福岡ゼネラルユニオン】の抗議で,アウルズは「遡っての雇用契約」に同意したが,市教委のアウルズへの派遣法違反の委託はそのままになっている.
大阪府教委では
直接雇用だが「5年限り」の有期雇用を打ち出し,争議のすえ無期限雇用に.だが03年より労組を嫌悪し,非正規雇用を導入.「委任・委託は違法なので,派遣にした」としつつ,乱脈な入札をECCにさせたため,25校に配置予定の講師が行方不明に.労組【ゼネラルユニオン】の抗議で,「派遣労働者で希望する者は直接雇用に」と回答しているが,矛盾だらけの派遣制度に今も固執.府下の枚方・豊中市教委は,府教委の「委託は違法の判断さえ守らず,全研ZIAやインタラックと,違法な委託契約を続けている.
西宮市教委では
全員が直接雇用であったのに,労組【ゼネラルユニオン】の警告を無視して,03年より新規採用を「委託」に切替え.「労組事務所貸与拒否」などの不当労働行為も多い中,労組に対抗しようとする教委の姿勢が明白に.
[top]
違法な「派遣」や「委託」ではなく まともな雇用を
今,自民党政府の規制緩和政策のもと,雇用破壊=賃金破壊が進行しています.フルタイマー雇用を避けた「臨時パート」や「期限付き」などの非正規雇用がその例です.だがもっと不安定で法違反がまかり通っているのが,「派遣」や「委託・委任」です.このケースでは,雇用主と就労場所が違ったりし,かつその両社が何れも雇用責任を取らない,といった現実があります.
「派遣」とは
労働者派遣法の規定で,免許を持っている派遣元の派遣会社が,労働者を雇用し,派遣契約を結んだ派遣先学校に,一定期間働きに行くよう業務命令するもの.派遣先は派遣元にまとめて契約金を払い,そこから賃金が支払われます.業務の指示・管理はすべて,派遣先教委に属します.労基法・労組法・社会保険・雇用保険の権利も全部あり,年次有給休暇取得や労組加盟もできます.派遣期間は3年を越えてはならず,期限に達した労働者が派遣先へ直接雇用を求めた場合,派遣先はそれに応じる法的義務【派遣法条】があります.
もし派遣先が派遣労働者を嫌がったり,派遣契約を解除した場合でも,派遣元は解雇できません.派遣元との雇用関係は変わらないので,仕事を提供し続ける義務があります.
「委任・委託」とは
「請負・下請け」ともいい,働きに来ている者は「労働者でなく,一人親方の事業主」のようになります.この場合,仕事の指示・管理はすべて委託された会社【個人】に属します.委託された会社が,さらに下請け労働者を雇用したり,再委託した個人に請け負わせるなど,「丸投げ」や「職業紹介のピンハネ」同然の複雑なケースもあります.
委託された個人は,労働者と認められず,労働法の権利はありません.税金も,所得税でなく事業税となります.契約解除は簡単で,保険もなく,解雇の扱いさえありません.
実態が派遣なのに,派遣法の順守を嫌って「委託・委任」にしている場合もあります.これは「偽装派遣」とも言えるもので,派遣法違反で摘発される対象です.
[top]
「派遣法の派遣」と「委託・委任」 どこで見分ける?
契約書をよく点検することです.が,「雇用や労働者性」を隠蔽するために,実態でない契約書にサインさせる会社もあります.法的には多くの判例にも示されている如く...
チェックポイント
- 誰が,仕事を指揮・管理しているか?
- 労働の対価としてのお金か.誰が払っているか?
- 採用・研修や,日々の作業指揮は誰がしたか?
- 作業報告は誰にするか?
- 教科書など,必要な資材は誰?
[top]

[top]
|
|